Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Offbeat Modest Dress

1/8/09 - Thrifty Thursday
A couple months ago I was asked to add one of my flickr wardrobe_remix pictures (see right) to an "Offbeat Modest Dress" group on flickr.

As it is advisable to do, I first scoped the group out before adding my picture.  As other flickr members likely know, there are quite a few fetish subcultures on flickr and you have to be wary of groups like "BBW in leggings" or suspicious of people who favorite all your pictures that include a pair of strappy sandals or Converse shoes. Recently I had someone favorite/gallery a couple of my photos as "Mature FTT" and I still haven't figured out what that means, but in both photos I'm wearing the same pair of red shoes so it must be shoe related.  Shoe fetishes are rampant on flickr, FYI!

At any rate, the "Offbeat Modest Dress" group seemed relatively harmless, if not a bit odd, deeming itself created so "that other people can realize that you don't have to give up being the bizarre person you are in order to be modest."  So I went ahead and added the four photos the admin from the group asked about.  

I'm not really sure I would want to, or could trust myself to add stuff just by default.  It isn't that I necessarily get dressed with modesty as my first priority, or as my intention.  Possibly modesty is just a by-product of my personal style?  Upon looking through my set of wardrobe pictures, it does look like most of them would fall into "modest" category.   And I guess that makes sense, as overall I'm a shy/modest type of gal, just a tad offbeat... so hey, why not?


Yet, what defines modest dress?  Wikipedia's entry on modesty is interesting and includes some info related to dress under the body modesty heading.  

Apparently "standards of modesty usually discourage non-essential exposure of the body. This applies to the bare skin, hair and undergarments, and especially to intimate parts. The standards not only call for the covering of parts of the body, but also obscuring their shape, by means of suitable clothing."


The image to the right illustrates a "mid-Victorian idea of how the hemlines of girls skirts should descend towards the ankle as a girl ages."  Wow, crazy!


Also it is interesting to think of it in terms of "body modesty" as in, are you trying to hide parts of your body?  This may be a more acceptable/understood/practiced definition, especially in terms of those of us who have bigger bodies to dress... upon looking into the "Offbeat Modest Dress" group, many of the contributors happen to be curvier ladies.  


But what are other "rules" for modest dress?  I suppose if I really dug deep I could unearth something pretty definitive.  However that would be like writing a research paper and I'm not up to that unless I'm getting college credit toward a PhD, or paid.  Instead I'll just summarize what I've found from a few searches and perusals of interesting links.    


Let's look at more "modest dress" online communities.  One other flickr group I've had at least one photo added to is one that questions what is deemed modest.  The "Is This Modest?" group defines itself as being "about images of people or outfits of clothing and whether the clothing is modest and proper-- it's meant to stir the question "Is This Modest?" to challenge what we think about modesty."  Having a peek into the pool of photos makes me think this one is no longer moderated all that well, also the last discussion topic was from six months ago, but still, it's existence makes it seem the question "is this modest?" is still unanswered.

Shade Clothing, an online retailer, was started after the Mormon behind it was frustrated finding "items that were stylish without being too revealing."  And here I'll delve into the idea that modest dress is typically identified with a religious way of thought.  If there is one thing I know about my tendency for modest dress, it is NOT related to religion.  However for many religious cultures, modest dress IS mandatory, an integral part of their communities.  


Shade Clothing was founded by a Mormon, and the Mormon religion, the Church of Latter-Day Saints (LDS), does issue guidelines for the modest dress of its members. Wikipedia tells me that Mormons believe that "Clothing which can stimulate sexual desires, such as "short shorts and skirts, tight clothing, and shirts that do not cover the stomach" are discouraged, as well as extremes in clothing or hairstyles."

Another modest dress online community I found, again related to the Mormon religion, is *Jen* Modest Fashion Magazine which defines itself as "an online magazine dedicated to the young female members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and anyone else who is interested in fashion without compromise..."  They provide a Modest Clothes Shopping Directory and, something I saw come up quite a bit in google searches, a section with information regarding modest prom dress and activities.  The fact that my prom dress  bared quite a bit of my neckline and shoulders with a hemline that showed my knees probably means it wasn't very modest.  


The modest dress mandate of the LDS can be taken to an EXTREME, such as by the fundamentalist LDS group in San Angelo TX that came into the news a couple years ago. What struck me first with that news story, other than the whole polygamist sect storyline, was their manner of dress.  The ladies all wore their hair pulled back and sported long sleeved long dresses.

Day 36:366 - Printer MaintenanceAt the time, it was style I was unknowingly championing myself!  As the headlines swirled, a few of the articles focused on their style of dress, though admittedly the main concern was the welfare of the children and the "wives."  Related to that is the notion that a mandated modest style of dress is a way to exert control or even fetish-ize the "innocent" look.  One of the articles even accused the husbands as practicing pedophilia.  I can't find that one now, but there have been a few sexual assault charges made in the aftermath.

Which makes a person think, modest dress(?), um ew, yuck.

Yet, I do think there is a place for "offbeat modest dress" - or - dressing somewhat modestly without being told to or believing someone said you should, etc.  Note, the group on flickr?  It is non-inclusive, "this is NOT strictly a religious group. You may add offbeat modest pictures of yourself whether you are religious or an atheist."  So I wonder, is there a type of person who just happens to dress modestly on their own accord?


091305If I had to describe why it is that I dress the way I do, I think I'd go back to what I said the first time anyone asked me about how I dressed... which was September 2005, after I added my first outfit (see left) to the wardrobe_remix group.  I'd described what I was wearing in a post on my LiveJournal, saying that lately I'd been dressing "like a hippie/amish/farmwife or something."   Tricia had questioned, "so, do you like this kind of style? or do you want to change it? it certainly looks comfortable. what kind of fashion are you drawn to, generally?"


I answered "Comfort is fairly important for me and to some extent, simplicity/convenience. I rarely wear accessories... my shoes are all comfort shoes... When I'm shopping or thrifting I'm drawn to fairly basic/classic items that I can mix & match, but they tend to be unique in their details, color, lines, texture, etc..."  This is pretty much how I dress and shop four years later.  I still don't think that I dress/shop with modesty as my main priority, but I HAVE bought several long-sleeved dresses lately...  hmmm.


Just this past week I added a layer to an outfit, and really it boiled down to modesty...   Mom and Dad were visiting and I'd gotten dressed in something I'd worn before, a black knit dress with a low scooped neckline.  I'd worn the dress out in the public then, but this time, upon entering the kitchen and having to bend down to pick something up off the floor, I felt like I was letting too much hang out, if you know what I mean.  So I went back and put a thin sleeveless t-shirt on underneath the dress and felt perfectly fine prancing around in front of the parents after that.  


Does modesty play a part in what you wear?  Do you ever feel a need to avoid non-essential exposure of the body?  Do you have any "body modesty" issues and does it effect what you wear?

Word count = 1552
Time to write/post = 2 hr

15 comments:

  1. Fantastic post! I was going to do something similar a few months back, but decided not to in case I offend anyone.

    The reason I was going to post was because my photos were repeatedly invited to the Is This Modest group? I eventually asked the guy not to invite me any more, and very polite he was too.

    At the time, I had no idea what modest meant (and to some extent I still don't - I am covered up but I wear shouty clothes - surely that is the opposite of modest - attention seeking!). I did a bit of searching around the ITM group and I wasn't very keen on what I found. The main argument seems to be that women should dress modestly so as to not lead the men that see them into temptation. No mention of men tempting the women who see them. And it seems to absolve men from any responsibility for their own thoughts, as if thinking about sex is some sort of automatic response to seeing a woman's arm! Also, its dangerously close to saying that it's a rape victims only have themselves to blame if they were wearing revealing clothes.

    Another reason I decided not to add my stuff to the group was because ITM is a group for outfits that are borderline modest, inviting people to judge whether they are 'in' or 'out'. I frankly didn't want to be judged by standards I hadn't signed up to, and didn't even understand.

    The other thing was that what was presumably borderline about my outfits always seemed to be that while I was completely covered up, my clothes were fitted. And you know I am a girl with a big bum and boobs and the offending thing seemed to be that you could see that. I just didn't think a straight shaped person would have been classed as borderline in the same way, so ultimately, people were asked to judge my body not my clothes (or different standards of clothing were applied to me because of the body I have).

    So I suppose generally I do dress modestly in that you can barely ever see a bit of skin, but not in terms of hiding my shape, and it is not at all an intentional thing.

    You know what, maybe I will do that post now after all!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice comment Franca. I'm sure you do a good post on the topic! There definitely are many different angles to come at it. The repression of "temptation" that you bring up is totally NOT something I'm trying to do either. I'm probably a bit like you in that for the most part I dress fairly loudly, and somewhat fitted too. Or at least I try to accentuate my waist when I can.

    I agree with you also that the "Is This modest" group does appear a bit sketchy and the whole rating yay/nay part of it is not something I'd want to be part of either. I think I only got asked to add a photo one time and I'm not sure if I did or not.

    On the otherhand the newer "Offbeat Modest Dress" group appears to be run by a woman (though you never know really) and seems to be more about celebrating "dress" rather than shaming the body. Which is why I ended up adding my photos and is what got me started thinking about the whole issue in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  3. thanks, I think I will do that post, since I have the bare bones of it already with my comment.

    I agree that the offbeat modest dress group seems fine, and I had actually added a few photos when they were invited a while ago. I wouldn't actively post in it though, since dressing modestly is not my aim.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey there, I'm Kiera Kristinsdottir, and I started the Offbeat Modest Dress blog (now defunct) that led to the creation of the Flickr group ... although I am an adherent of a religion (I became Eastern Orthodox several years ago), I can't say my motivations for modest dressing are really Religious. They're more Aesthetic and ... well, philosophical.

    Psst: secret: I don't wear a bra, either, ever, and that's one reason I started wearing a couple layers on top ... comfort is one thing, Complete Nipple Disclosure totally another thing.

    Here's a link you might find interesting, to an essay by Suzanne Brogger, Danish feminist: http://tinyurl.com/ycrk6fy She wrote it in 1979, and it pretty much Speaks to My Condition about wearing something on your head. I was fascinated and excited to find this essay, as you usually find more religious takes on this subject. This is pretty darned rare.

    Best wishes and cheers,


    Kiera

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for this great post. I don't have much specific to say other than I enjoyed it. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for your comments!

    And to Kiera for sharing that link, I'll check it out. I glossed over a LOT of bits concerning modesty, headwear is definitely involved in many cases!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fabulous post! Modesty is so multi-faceted... is it to draw attention away from one's body? Deflect sexual attention? Demonstrate that one is not concerned with such "earthly" things as attention seeking or carnal delights (I'm having fun typing that!) Is it about being ashamed of one's figure, obscuring it, etc? I always think of Neve Campbell's character in The Craft, where she wears huge gigantic garments to cover the fact that she is ashamed of her scars.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I just came across this blog and found it very interesting indeed.Thanks for sharing.

    http://www.modestkini.com/

    ReplyDelete
  9. I've only just discovered this post, and I have to say I find it fascinating and quite exciting!

    I consider my way of dress to be modest. But I have no religious convictions whatsoever. I am a confirmed, card carrying, absolutely solid in my beliefs atheist. Yet I dress modestly.

    My own personal feelings on this are that first and foremost I do not feel comfortable when dressed immodestly. While I would on a hot summer evening put on a pair of 'short' shorts I would not wear them out of the home as I would feel uncomfortable. I am not ashamed of my body (with the exception of the post-pregnancy tummy!) , I just do not feel the need to show it off to everyone.

    I'm not sure if how I dress could be considered 'off beat'; I tend to wear long skirts with t-shirts or blouses, sometimes dresses and on the occasions where I do wear pants they are usually loose fitting slacks.

    I do not want to gain the attention of people through showing off my body. I would much rather someone noticed my personality first. To me it is about dignity.

    Sometimes it feels as though I am the only person in the world that must feel like this! So it was quite refreshing to find an article on modest dress which isn't associated with religious practices.

    One of the comments mentioned that modesty is multifaceted and I couldn't agree more. As a society we seem to have been driven to rejecting everything to do with religion and therefore modesty or having the stereotype placed upon us that if we do choose to dress modestly it must be because we are religious fundamentalists.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've only just discovered this post, and I have to say I find it fascinating and quite exciting!

    I consider my way of dress to be modest. But I have no religious convictions whatsoever. I am a confirmed, card carrying, absolutely solid in my beliefs atheist. Yet I dress modestly.

    My own personal feelings on this are that first and foremost I do not feel comfortable when dressed immodestly. While I would on a hot summer evening put on a pair of 'short' shorts I would not wear them out of the home as I would feel uncomfortable. I am not ashamed of my body (with the exception of the post-pregnancy tummy!) , I just do not feel the need to show it off to everyone.

    I'm not sure if how I dress could be considered 'off beat'; I tend to wear long skirts with t-shirts or blouses, sometimes dresses and on the occasions where I do wear pants they are usually loose fitting slacks.

    I do not want to gain the attention of people through showing off my body. I would much rather someone noticed my personality first. To me it is about dignity.

    Sometimes it feels as though I am the only person in the world that must feel like this! So it was quite refreshing to find an article on modest dress which isn't associated with religious practices.

    One of the comments mentioned that modesty is multifaceted and I couldn't agree more. As a society we seem to have been driven to rejecting everything to do with religion and therefore modesty or having the stereotype placed upon us that if we do choose to dress modestly it must be because we are religious fundamentalists.

    ReplyDelete
  11. thanks, I think I will do that post, since I have the bare bones of it already with my comment.

    I agree that the offbeat modest dress group seems fine, and I had actually added a few photos when they were invited a while ago. I wouldn't actively post in it though, since dressing modestly is not my aim.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Fabulous post! Modesty is so multi-faceted... is it to draw attention away from one's body? Deflect sexual attention? Demonstrate that one is not concerned with such "earthly" things as attention seeking or carnal delights (I'm having fun typing that!) Is it about being ashamed of one's figure, obscuring it, etc? I always think of Neve Campbell's character in The Craft, where she wears huge gigantic garments to cover the fact that she is ashamed of her scars.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Fantastic post! I was going to do something similar a few months back, but decided not to in case I offend anyone.

    The reason I was going to post was because my photos were repeatedly invited to the Is This Modest group? I eventually asked the guy not to invite me any more, and very polite he was too.

    At the time, I had no idea what modest meant (and to some extent I still don't - I am covered up but I wear shouty clothes - surely that is the opposite of modest - attention seeking!). I did a bit of searching around the ITM group and I wasn't very keen on what I found. The main argument seems to be that women should dress modestly so as to not lead the men that see them into temptation. No mention of men tempting the women who see them. And it seems to absolve men from any responsibility for their own thoughts, as if thinking about sex is some sort of automatic response to seeing a woman's arm! Also, its dangerously close to saying that it's a rape victims only have themselves to blame if they were wearing revealing clothes.

    Another reason I decided not to add my stuff to the group was because ITM is a group for outfits that are borderline modest, inviting people to judge whether they are 'in' or 'out'. I frankly didn't want to be judged by standards I hadn't signed up to, and didn't even understand.

    The other thing was that what was presumably borderline about my outfits always seemed to be that while I was completely covered up, my clothes were fitted. And you know I am a girl with a big bum and boobs and the offending thing seemed to be that you could see that. I just didn't think a straight shaped person would have been classed as borderline in the same way, so ultimately, people were asked to judge my body not my clothes (or different standards of clothing were applied to me because of the body I have).

    So I suppose generally I do dress modestly in that you can barely ever see a bit of skin, but not in terms of hiding my shape, and it is not at all an intentional thing.

    You know what, maybe I will do that post now after all!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you for this great post. I don't have much specific to say other than I enjoyed it. :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey there, I'm Kiera Kristinsdottir, and I started the Offbeat Modest Dress blog (now defunct) that led to the creation of the Flickr group ... although I am an adherent of a religion (I became Eastern Orthodox several years ago), I can't say my motivations for modest dressing are really Religious. They're more Aesthetic and ... well, philosophical.

    Psst: secret: I don't wear a bra, either, ever, and that's one reason I started wearing a couple layers on top ... comfort is one thing, Complete Nipple Disclosure totally another thing.

    Here's a link you might find interesting, to an essay by Suzanne Brogger, Danish feminist: http://tinyurl.com/ycrk6fy She wrote it in 1979, and it pretty much Speaks to My Condition about wearing something on your head. I was fascinated and excited to find this essay, as you usually find more religious takes on this subject. This is pretty darned rare.

    Best wishes and cheers,


    Kiera

    ReplyDelete